Profile

Search Blog

Favourite Sites

- Black Agenda Report
- Can This CD Stop War? (my CD)
- Chicago "L" .org
- iNTERNETSCELEBRITIES
- Medialens
- Muslimah Media Watch
- Noteworthy Software

This is Leading

This needs no comment.

egyptsupportswi

Lead!

I ran across an old button yesterday that says, "If the people lead, eventually, the leaders will follow".

Stop looking to whore-politicians for change. They're paid to keep things as they are, paid by corporations. Look at Egypt, look at Tunisia. There's how change really happens, and change for the better. Poll after poll shows that most Americans want progressive policies. It's their "leaders" who don't. Obama is the chief lackey for corporate America, and is loving a Republican majority in the House.

If the people lead, eventually, the leaders will follow. Get 'em in tow today!!!

But before you do, maybe you should read this

Murderers get off; Whistle blowers go to jail

Private Bradley Manning is a hero. So much so that the US Defence Department has jailed him, and is getting ready to try him because he leaked some video footage containing scenes of blatant murder committed by US forces in Iraq. You can read more about this and see the video HERE. You can support Bradley Manning HERE

When writing about Wikileaks in the New Yorker a few weeks back,Raffi Khatchadourian, the author of the article alleges that there is some legal ambiguity about the actions of the soldiers.

[Julian Paul] Assange [of Wikileaks]saw these events in sharply delineated moral terms, yet the footage did not offer easy legal judgments. In the month before the video was shot, members of the battalion on the ground, from the Sixteenth Infantry Regiment, had suffered more than a hundred and fifty attacks and roadside bombings, nineteen injuries, and four deaths; early that morning, the unit had been attacked by small-arms fire. The soldiers in the Apache were matter-of-fact about killing and spoke callously about their victims, but the first attack could be judged as a tragic misunderstanding. The attack on the van was questionable—the use of force seemed neither thoughtful nor measured—but soldiers are permitted to shoot combatants, even when they are assisting the wounded, and one could argue that the Apache’s crew, in the heat of the moment, reasonably judged the men in the van to be assisting the enemy. Phase three may have been unlawful, perhaps negligent homicide or worse. Firing missiles into a building, in daytime, to kill six people who do not appear to be of strategic importance is an excessive use of force. This attack was conducted with scant deliberation, and it is unclear why the Army did not investigate it.(Read more of the article)

Note that it is just assumed that the war is legal, and that the foreign forces which invaded Iraq have a framework for committing acts of murder and destruction because, well, they're there. Curiously, when one's home is invaded in the United States, any force used to defend it is justified. As well, were there an invasion of the US, all means of repelling the invaders would be justified, and the defenders would not be called "insurgents". The off-hand acceptance of the invasion, and the justification that, because there have been roadside bombings committed against foreign troops these troops are somehow justified in gunning down civilians makes you wonder what kind of moral planet Raffi Khatchadourian hails from. And then to go on about legal ambiguities...

This is the danger of War Talk. You start talking in the terms and with the assumptions of the war makers. Soon, you can justify the war, tacitly, even if you oppose it. You do this when you ask for a planned, timed withdrawal rather than an immediate, unconditional withdrawal, or when you get into quibbling discussions about troop levels, or when you use the (illegal, and in any case, immoral) war to frame actions that would be crimes if committed during peace time. War Talk is the obscene gibberish that keeps these things going. To his credit, Mr. Khatchadourian does go on to talk about the coverage by the mainstream media, and their inability and lack of desire to talk about the Wikileaks video intelligently. From them, there is even more gibberish....but then, you know that's what you'd get from them. Of course, Mr. Khatchadourian is less critical of the uncritical media.

G8 G20

It's instructive to consider the G 20 and G 8 meetings held recently in Toronto, but also the ones held elsewhere.

Isn't it interesting that there are protests and not throngs of adoring constituents that show up to great the "leaders"? This is largely because there aren't any adoring masses clamouring for a view of these figureheads for all that is bad about capitalism (come to think of it, most every thing is bad about capitalism....). Mostly, they are greeted, from outside their fortresses, by those that have legitimate grievances.

I have also come to realise that the greatest instigation to violent confrontation is the fences, walls, and massive police presence. The Toronto Police Service seems to be up to the, at least North American, standard set by the Chicago Police in 1968 for being goons and bullies. I wonder why police forces attract (or maybe recruit) such a disproportionate number of bullies, goons, and racists.

I challenge the rulers of the world to encounter the people who elect to (or tolerate there being in) office and listen to their grievances without fences or walls between them.

One last thought: Could be that the fences were there to produce a zoo-like effect, and we were meant all along to come and look at -- but not to feed -- the animals.

A Weblog About Music and Other Things

Blogging system for your website...